CEO turnover has reached record levels in 2025, with April alone seeing a 70% jump in departures compared to last year, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas. The leadership void has pushed boards to rely heavily on interim and boomerang CEOs, exposing deep flaws in corporate succession planning.
The outplacement firm reports that 18% of new CEOs this year were appointed on an interim basis—double last year’s figure—while the Financial Times highlights that returning “boomerang” CEOs have hit a 10-year high. Analysts warn this is more than a passing trend; it reflects years of short-term thinking and weak leadership pipelines.
One major factor is retirement, with nearly a quarter of CEO exits from January to April tied to baby boomers stepping down. As a result, companies often lack “ready-now” successors, leaving boards scrambling for quick fixes.
Interim leaders provide stability, offering crisis-tested experience and the ability to make fast decisions without political baggage. Boomerang CEOs bring familiarity and immediate credibility with stakeholders, helping calm markets during transitions. But both approaches carry risks. Interim CEOs often focus narrowly on short-term challenges, while boomerang CEOs typically last less than two years, potentially stalling cultural and strategic alignment.
Experts caution that an overreliance on temporary leaders signals reactionary governance and undermines investor confidence. Boards must ask tough questions about stabilization, decision-making limits, and succession support before making interim appointments.
Ultimately, interim and boomerang CEOs should be viewed as stopgap solutions. Companies that continue to neglect long-term succession planning risk compounding instability. Strong leadership pipelines remain the only sustainable path to lasting corporate success.
Explore CXO Insider for the latest innovations in Operations, IT, and Finance, featuring valuable insights from top C-Level industry leaders!
Source: Ceoworld.Biz
